Edit Content

Support & Email

gastroexperts@gmail.com

Customer Support

(+91) 83330 52520

Our Location

GASTROEXPERTS,
5th floor, KIMS-SUNSHINE HOSPITALS, Begumpet, Hyderabad, Telangana-500016

Stay Connected

EMR vs. ESD

  1. Home
  2. »
  3. Services
  4. »
  5. EMR vs. ESD

EMR vs. ESD

Choosing the Right Endoscopic Resection Technique for Removing Polyps and Early Cancers

EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection) and ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection) are both minimally invasive endoscopic procedures used to remove abnormal growths, such as polyps and early-stage cancers, from the lining of the digestive tract. However, they differ in their approach and suitability for various situations. Here’s a breakdown to help you understand which procedure might be recommended for you:

EMR (Endoscopic Mucosal Resection)

Technique

EMR is a more straightforward procedure in which a specialized snare is inserted through the endoscope to loop around the polyp's base. An electric current is then passed through the snare, cutting and removing the polyp from the digestive tract's mucosal layer (the surface lining).


Advantages

EMR is a less complex procedure with a shorter recovery time than ESD.



Applications

EMR is suitable for removing smaller polyps (generally less than 2 cm) confined to the mucosal layer. It's often the preferred approach for:
• Precancerous polyps (adenomas)
• Early-stage cancers limited to the mucosa

Limitations

EMR may not be suitable for larger polyps or those that have grown deeper into the submucosal layer (the tissue beneath the mucosa).

ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection)

Technique

ESD is a more advanced and technically demanding procedure. It involves injecting a fluid beneath the polyp to create a submucosal cushion, allowing for better visualization and maneuverability. Specialized instruments are then used to dissect the polyp layer by layer, separating it from the deeper tissues before complete removal.

Advantages

ESD offers a higher chance of complete polyp removal, especially for larger or deeper lesions, potentially reducing the risk of cancer recurrence.

Applications

ESD removes larger polyps (often exceeding 1 cm) or those that show more profound growth into the submucosal layer. It's also preferred for::
• Removing lesions with an uncertain depth of invasion
• Achieving complete en-bloc resection (removal of the entire polyp in one piece) for better cancer staging and prognosis

Limitations

ESD is a more complex procedure with a longer learning curve for endoscopists. It also carries a slightly higher risk of complications compared to EMR.

Choosing Between EMR and ESD

The decision of whether EMR or ESD is more appropriate for you will depend on several factors, including:

1

Size and location of the polyp

Larger polyps or those in difficult-to-reach areas might be better suited for ESD.

01

2

Depth of the polyp

If the polyp has grown deeper into the submucosal layer, ESD is likely recommended.

02

3

Need for complete en-bloc resection

For definitive cancer diagnosis and staging, ESD may be preferred.

03

4

Your overall health and risk factors

Your doctor will consider your medical history and suitability for a more complex procedure.

04

Consult with your Gastroenterologist

Suppose you have been diagnosed with a polyp or abnormal growth in your digestive tract. In that case, your gastroenterologist will discuss your treatment options and recommend the most suitable procedure, EMR or ESD, based on your specific case. They will explain the details of each procedure, potential risks and benefits, and help you make an informed decision about your care.